A more formal greeting
May 22nd 2009 18:06
The preceding piece was written by Nevar who is going to post occasional material to this site. I welcomed him in a comment appended to his article but I think that the occasion deserves special attention.
My comment was
It has been my wish to have a site where those whose views differ from my own would have a forum where the views could be presented in one place. And, as Nevar was pointed out to SL,
SL, you are always welcome to post here, too, to point out the flaws in my point of view. Only rules are: no ad hominem attacks, no B.S.(B.O.), no “Obiden”. In short, office holders are referred to by their honorific. Want to try?
My comment was
With this post, Nevar becomes a member of politicalcertainty.com; he will add his thoughts here, as well as at his other informative, literary and thoughtful sites, Alaska Chronicle and ad hominem. Our individual views are not and will not be in sync and that is how it should be. One promise that we both make is that there will be no ad hominem attacks, no name-calling. We can and will disagree with the political or social policies of public figures, of either party without calling the individual’s patriotism into question.
As to waterboarding, my opinion has vacillated. On the one hand, if the facts are that the relevant intelligence could be and was obtained by the time the waterboarding was instituted and that the purpose of the technique was to obtain information linking al Qaeda with Iraq so as to justify and validate the political aims of President Bush and the neo-cons, then the practice was inexcusable. On the other hand, if it were the case that a terrorist attack against this country was thwarted, then I might feel otherwise,
So far, the evidence supports the former.
I think we all will have to wait for further information – at least I will.
Anyway, a warm welcome to Nevar; I wish him well.
As to waterboarding, my opinion has vacillated. On the one hand, if the facts are that the relevant intelligence could be and was obtained by the time the waterboarding was instituted and that the purpose of the technique was to obtain information linking al Qaeda with Iraq so as to justify and validate the political aims of President Bush and the neo-cons, then the practice was inexcusable. On the other hand, if it were the case that a terrorist attack against this country was thwarted, then I might feel otherwise,
So far, the evidence supports the former.
I think we all will have to wait for further information – at least I will.
Anyway, a warm welcome to Nevar; I wish him well.
It has been my wish to have a site where those whose views differ from my own would have a forum where the views could be presented in one place. And, as Nevar was pointed out to SL,
Thank you SL, my occasional postings will help keep things in perspective for us rabid conservative radicals.
| 43 |
| Vote |












Comment by Nevar
Is Why