A note that, if read, will be ignored.
October 1st 2008 11:14
To SLB, Lester and their followers:
I realize that SLB prides herself on not reading my scribblings and so she will not see this. Lester does, however, drop by from time to time, to express dismay at my liberal views.
Kathleen Parker, a conservative writer for The Washington Post (yes, they do exist!), wrote a piece supportive of Governor Sarah Palin. Then, on September 28, Ms Parker wrote an article suggesting that, upon reflection, the Alaska Governor was not qualified and
Really Long Link
In this morning's Post, Ms Parker speaks of some mail she received. Her article is very important.
Really Long Link
I would commend these comments to the political rabid -- on both sides:
The problem is that those who should take notice, won't.
I realize that SLB prides herself on not reading my scribblings and so she will not see this. Lester does, however, drop by from time to time, to express dismay at my liberal views.
Kathleen Parker, a conservative writer for The Washington Post (yes, they do exist!), wrote a piece supportive of Governor Sarah Palin. Then, on September 28, Ms Parker wrote an article suggesting that, upon reflection, the Alaska Governor was not qualified and
Finally, Palin's narrative is fun, inspiring and all-American in that frontier way we seem to admire. When Palin first emerged as John McCain's running mate, I confess I was delighted. She was the antithesis and nemesis of the hirsute, Birkenstock-wearing sisterhood -- a refreshing feminist of a different order who personified the modern successful working mother. Palin didn't make a mess cracking the glass ceiling. She simply glided through it.
It was fun while it lasted. ....
If Palin were a man, we'd all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she's a woman -- and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket -- we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.
What to do?
McCain can't repudiate his choice of running mate. He not only risks the wrath of the GOP's unforgiving base, but he invites others to second-guess his executive decision-making ability. Barack Obama faces the same problem with Biden.
Only Palin can save McCain, her party and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.
Do it for your country.
If Palin were a man, we'd all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she's a woman -- and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket -- we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.
What to do?
McCain can't repudiate his choice of running mate. He not only risks the wrath of the GOP's unforgiving base, but he invites others to second-guess his executive decision-making ability. Barack Obama faces the same problem with Biden.
Only Palin can save McCain, her party and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.
Do it for your country.
Really Long Link
In this morning's Post, Ms Parker speaks of some mail she received. Her article is very important.
Really Long Link
I would commend these comments to the political rabid -- on both sides:
That we have become a partisan nation is no secret. This week has provided a vivid example of where rabid partisanship leads with the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration's role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill.
Everyone's to blame, by the way.
Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now. More important in the long term is the less tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves.
The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve.
Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different from one's own, we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)
I'm sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column's publication, a conservative organization canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly.
Unfortunately, that's the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles.
Our day of reckoning may indeed be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas.
In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in tomorrow's debate and speak her true mind.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration's role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill.
Everyone's to blame, by the way.
Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now. More important in the long term is the less tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves.
The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve.
Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different from one's own, we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)
I'm sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column's publication, a conservative organization canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly.
Unfortunately, that's the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles.
Our day of reckoning may indeed be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas.
In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in tomorrow's debate and speak her true mind.
The problem is that those who should take notice, won't.
| 37 |
| Vote |
Shared on
Subscribe to this blog
















Comment by Lester Caudill
Round Politics
But it was the folks back home that said don't do this, and the Congress listen.
Jim where have you been, haven't you been watching the news, or didn't Chris Matthews, and Keith Olbermann make mention that Sarah Palin has been eviscerated, and disparaged by the media.
She has been attacked on every side, her family has been attacked, her personal life has been attacked, her love for her children has been attacked, her downs syndrome child has been brought into this. Her pregnant teenager has had to face the wrath of the liberal media.
Jim the ones making this country partisan is the main stream media they are the ones carry the torch for Barack and Biden, and they are the ones trying to do the damage, seems to me these nut case wants to make news not report it, I feel they have stay longer than they are needed.