Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
See also: www.associatedcontent.com/user/20932/jim_stillman.html and http://jimspoliticalcertainty.worldblogosphere.com and Always Positive, Sometimes Right Tampa Bay restaurants

Enough about the President's religion

June 3rd 2009 14:15
I really am not certain of the significance of the far Right’s, Fox’s and a few others’ fixation on the President’s faith. Normally, we take a person’s word on the specific Deity to whom one chooses to pray or even the absence of such a Deity.

Certainly, many of President Obama’s critics, including those at this site who cannot even bear to write his name (now, that’s hatred!) claim to be members of the Clergy and Christian; I take them at their word. If the President says that he is a Christian that ends the irrelevant question. This does not mean that I agree with all of the tenets of that faith, and I do not. But the issue of his being Christian is settled.


But the question itself is offensive and actually dismissed in the Constitution which flatly forbids any religious qualifications for office. Why is it that some on the Right think so highly of the Constitution – sometimes.

The President asserts that he is Christian, not Muslim. The statements to the contrary have been researched and repudiated over and over again. If anyone can cite primary evidence otherwise, state it.

If, arguendo, he were Muslim, so what? Does belief in Islam equal terrorist about to attack America? Does every, or even a majority of the 1.8 Billion Muslims, wish to engage in jihad? Are they all out to get us?

Or are some of us allowing fear to control our lives?

And if the fear takes over reason, the bad few will have succeeded beyond their wildest and craziest dreams.
95
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
24 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Lester Caudill

June 3rd 2009 18:53
Hey Jim I know I am one of the people you were talking about here. I do believe he is Muslim or atheist, I don't know which one, but Christian no possible way. And if it were found out that he truly were Muslim that would mean that he lied, because there was no way he could have gotten elected professing his Muslim faith.

I don't hate Obama or B.O. or however I decide to write his name, I hate what he stands for, which is the destruction of America, and what it stood for. During the campaign Obama used the words remake, transforming, not rebuilding, or restoring America, now you see what we have become a socialist nation with no core beliefs, and he did in hundred days.

I have friends and neighbors that can't find a job, what happened to the promise of three to four million new jobs where are they, we are deeper in debt than we have ever been with no way out, we are owned by China we have become slaves to the Government.

Jim you are a educated man can't you see what's going on, come on man just admit you were wrong. Faith does matter, and it not hate if we don't agree with everything he is doing, but rather love for our country and country men and women that are trying to make this country great for their families.

Now they have one huge extra obstacle to over come as if it wasn't hard enough before, now they got big brother stealing more from and giving the less. You talk about Fox, can't you see how the MSM are just cheerleaders for the democratic party.

What about the Muslim that killed one and wounded another soldier in Arkansas it was politically, and religion motivated? The main stream liberal media is keep a lid on it aren't they. While trying to blame conservative Christians for the murder of the baby killing Dr. Tiller.

If we seem upset well we have a right to be, but freedom of speech only applies to democrats, and liberals republicans must hold their peace, and follow blindly till we fall over the cliff.

Comment by Nevar

June 4th 2009 01:55
Actually, the presidents religion is of a major concern to me; it is an indicator of his moral compass or of it's lacking.

When I see him politicizing his faith to meet the needs of the moment, I am appalled and left doubt filled.

He is disingenuous about matters of faith, and that calls into question his ability to govern openly or truthfully.

He isn't trustworthy. When convenient, he turns against the US and sides with our enemies publically; that is reprehensible as far as I am concerned.

Comment by Anonymous

June 4th 2009 08:52
I would comment, but accodring to Morgan's latest post, Catholics should not talk about politicians they haven't met.

Yay for freddom of speech!

Comment by Nevar

June 4th 2009 09:16
Hey leave Freddom out of this, he ain't nevar hurt no one.

Comment by DeAnne

June 4th 2009 15:26
I agree with you, Jim. The problem is that many Christians (especially those on the Far Right) don't believe that anyone is a Chrisitan unless he/she believes exactly the same way they do. In actuality, however, there are many Christians who aren't far right, who don't have the same extreme beliefs as mainstream Christianity. The way I see it, EXTREME Christians are just as bad as EXTREME Muslims. I know I'll get bashed for this - I always do - but it IS possible to be a Christian and a Liberal at the same time. In my opinion, Jesus was liberal. He stood against the status quo of his time. He was for the "little people" and told us that the meek would inherit the earth. (Note that is MEEK not WEAK.) Early Christians were socialists. They combined their wealth to care for those who didn't have as much. They took care of the poor, widows, children, etc. They came together for communal meals, and they did all they could to help others. Yes, they also spread the word, but they didn't force it on anyone. Mainstream Christianity today has gotten so far away from what Christ taught and stood for. Sometimes I am ashamed to say I am a Christian. I am NEVER ashamed to say that I have a personal relationship with Jesus, my Lord and Savior, but I AM ashamed to be associated with the types of Christians who believe that everyone else must believe exactly as they do in order to have that relationship with Christ or God.

Comment by Jim Stillman

June 4th 2009 16:39
Thank you for your wisdom and astuteness – that means, you agree with me!

Seriously, DeAnne, one of the more bothersome of the comments of the Far Far Right has been the constant use of the verb, “hate” and other personal pejoratives. One may disagree with a political, societal, ethical decision, but to hate the person with whom you disagree seems to be contrary to the tenets of the Christian faith. Certainly, Jesus did not advocate such an emotion.

We can discuss the merits or flaws in the President’s direction, position, values, and a plethora of issues; don’t waste time stating that he is a Muslim traitor with a specific intent to destroy the United States. Say that he is saying things with which you may disagree; don’t get nutty and accuse him of lying.

All I have been trying to do is bring civility into the discussions.

Many of the far right bloggers on this and other sites are incapable of this. They cheapen their arguments with silly names [B.O. (B.S.)] or such then innocently look at the sky and declare, “Huh?” Someone please buy them a Thesaurus

This has all been a digression. My point was to thank you for a well-expressed comment. That we agree is, to me, frosting on the cake.
• ,


Comment by Nevar

June 4th 2009 16:51
How can either of you equate radical christians to radical islam?

How many radical christian armed jihadi's are engaged with shooting, bombing and terrorizing innocents?

Jim, history will prove out one way or the other whether or not Obama's an able leader; I say not.

Comment by Jeff Musall

June 5th 2009 05:35
As for the difference between radical islam and radical christianity, the only differences are the environment in which they exist....holy wars and jihads arise out of opportunity and chaos...if America were in anything close to the condition of Afghanistan, for example, rabid christian groups would be all over the place.
As for the religion of the president, it is truly a shame that any president must bow at the feet of christian dogma...I wish Lester were right, and Obama was Atheist. Any president should be free to have any religion, but should never be allowed to allow it to guide their governance..

Comment by Nevar

June 5th 2009 07:13
.if America were in anything close to the condition of Afghanistan, for example, rabid christian groups would be all over the place.

We were, remember the war for Independence, the original tea party and things? We won.

Jews, Christians, Catholics and atheists won that little fracas. There wasn't a muslim in the bunch as far as I know.

As far as environments go, radical islam destroyed the advanced society that was once Islam. Not christians, not the jews, not catholics, atheists under islam would have been 2nd class citizens but they didn't destroy that society, but islamic extremists did.

A man without faith should never be allowed to govern this country; a man or woman without faith is delusional or a liar.

Comment by Anonymous

June 5th 2009 13:10
Why was Mitt Romney's and Sarah Palin's religion free reign for criticism; yet Obama's deemed untouchable?

Comment by Jim Stillman

June 5th 2009 13:29
The President's religion, like most things, is open for discussion.

But, as I have tried to explain, one can have his or her own opinions, but not his or her facts.

One cannot start off with the statement that President Obama is a Muslim (he says he isn't), then go on to Muslims want to destroy America (all of them? Most of them?) a fairly large stretch and then conclude the President wants to destroy America.

Another example, one blogger on Orble excuses the killer of Dr. Tiller in Kansas, with the suggestion that, maybe, he has a granddaughter whohade a late term abortion and has been traumatized. If one wants to justify or explain the killing, that's fine but you cannot invent grandchildren!

Comment by Nevar

June 5th 2009 18:21

One cannot start off with the statement that President Obama is a Muslim (he says he isn't), then go on to Muslims want to destroy America (all of them? Most of them?) a fairly large stretch and then conclude the President wants to destroy America.

Jim, Obama is going around to muslim countries playing his muslim roots card and declaring that the US isn't a christian country . . .

Comment by Randy Inman

June 5th 2009 23:06
I am an agnostic sometimes right wing (depending on the issue) guy. I have always contended that President Obama isn't religious and uses religion to further his power. He needed to be seen in the Black Community when he started politics. He is a left wing extremist so that kind of church appealed to him. He was raised in or at least around the Islamic Faith, and coupled with his far left thinking, the extreme of that faith appeals to him.

He is kissing Muslim butt because the Democrats are trying a be nice to them and they will be nice to us tact. I don’t think it will work but they figure it’s worth a shot. Due to how and where he was raised he is also probably bigoted against Israel. How much that will affect how he does his job only time will tell.

I have been calling him a Socialist for quite some time but am starting to doubt that. He loves big business too much, even though it’s the ones that put him in office that he favors. He is even starting to remind me of George Bush in some ways. Love of the big oil countries and keeping two wars going. I predict it will be a Republican President who ends the war in Iraq, probably Palin. (yes I put that name in to see if anyone is even reading this)

I honestly don’t hate President Obama, but I do hate what he is doing to this country. He is selling the future of our kids to the Unions and HIS big business cronies.

Comment by Jeff Musall

June 6th 2009 15:30
What comments from those on the right demonstrate (here and elsewhere) is just how far to the right America has drifted as a whole, and how extreme the views of the base have become. When Obama, who, by any reasonable measure, has governed so far very much from the center, is called "far left" .....and people like Nevar assume their own twisted "faith" is the same a president should have - we indeed have along way to go.

Comment by Jim Stillman

June 6th 2009 16:48


To my fellow Orbler, Nevar, the President has never said the U.S. is not a Christian country, what he did say was

"One of the great strengths of the United States, is that we have a very large Christian population [but] we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values."

I agree with that completely. We are not a theocracy – Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or Druid.


Comment by Nevar

June 6th 2009 17:05
Randy study the roots of Acorn, an organization Obama is joined with at the hip. You surfaced some great points Randy.


Comment by Nevar

June 6th 2009 17:39
Jeff, are you a raving loonie?

is called "far left" .....and people like Nevar assume their own twisted "faith" is the same a president should have

Your hubris has exceeded your mental capacity ~ America is a Republic and was founded as such for a reason. Liberalism is steering us into the folds of socialism; liberalism has oft been described as a mental disorder and you tend to lend that theory substance. Obama has harmed this country in ways you can't imagine and choose to ignore when it slaps you in the face. Even the Russians are amazed at our march into socialism and view the situation with bemusement; don't those American's know it's a failed system.

I doubt that you can recognize the roots of my faith were it to bite you in the bum. Obama needs a modicum of real faith and substantive plans for this country. Obama is like a street hustler, he'll say anything to close a deal and his mack daddy posturing is annoyingly familiar to any hooker on the street.

Comment by Nevar

June 6th 2009 17:54
Jim, your argument is well said, but historically not accurate.

You are correct, this country was never meant to be theocratic. Nor was it meant to be a kingdom or any other form of government other than a democratic Republic.

When our political spokesmen have described it addressing world leaders, it was described a democratic republic whose legal compass and constitution were based upon Judeo - Christian principles, not those of nature worshipers, animists, not Islamic, not Druidism, and even the atheists among the group chose to adopt a moral compass they knew would help avoid moral anarchy.

To say that we are a largely Christian country is historically accurate.

Comment by Jeff Musall

June 6th 2009 17:58
Hitting those right wing talking points, eh? Of all the strawmen the right throw up, ACORN is probably the most laughable...if you listen to the right, ACORN is a bunch of brownshirts running around, when actually they are far less of a conflict than say, churches holding registration drives in church, while handing out right wing voter "guides."
Nevar, your racist comment about Obama does little except to further marginalize your side.
Randy, as an agonstic you, and others like you, puzzle me....what draws you to someone like Palin?

Comment by Nevar

June 6th 2009 17:59
We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.

To continue, Jim, those ideals and values referred to by Obama weren't based upon secular humanity, those ideals were under pinned with Judeo ~ Christian based principles.

Comment by Nevar

June 6th 2009 18:12
....what draws you to someone like Palin?

Two things:
1 ~ She is more woman than you'll ever have,
2 ~ She is more of a man than you'll ever be.

Acorn started out standing for something, but has devolved. Morphing into something vile. You haven't researched it have you? You haven't bothered to look past the boundaries of the bubble you live in to examine for yourself what the truth is and that is glaringly obvious.

Jeff, in the future, please don't enter into a debate unarmed, thank you.

Comment by Randy Inman

June 6th 2009 21:09
Jeff what draws me to Palin is her conservatism and the fact that the Liberal Media (which I despise) hates her. What the left does not understand is that the more they rant about somebody, the more we like them (see Rush)

I can look beyond Palin’s religion for several reasons. The first is that a persons religion is not all of what they are, or with most anyway. And I said Agnostic not Atheist, I do attend church from time to time and enjoy it. If somebody gave me a feasible answer to why I should believe in God (proof he is there) other than “Have faith” I would embrace religion. Also Christian values are more along the lines of how I believe than the far left’s values.

I have three political issues that I am adamant about, the rest do not matter to me as much. I am for free speech, the right to bear arms and lower taxes means more jobs and a better economy. Palin is satisfactory to me on those three main issues

Comment by Jeff Musall

June 6th 2009 21:20
Well, at least you gave me a real answer, thank you!
I wouldn't be so concerned about religion if it wasn't for the fact that there is a strong difference from the casual/social church goer and/or believer, and the holy roller type that infuses their belief system into everything, and Palin fits that to a tee...also, I would challenge your pretense about the "liberal media" just because not every network reports like fox does doesn't make them biased. If anything I would say the media is conservative, but that's just me (and stats, but hey)

Comment by Randy Inman

June 6th 2009 22:10
Jeff to you Karl Marx is a conservative!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
5 Posts
2 Posts
272 Posts dating from July 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Jim Stillman's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Jim Stillman
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]